can i get a reason for 95264??? its a good edit!
Posted under General
emilysafeharbor said:
Not sure if this is the right place to put this, but every time I try to upload something it goes to 100% and then . . . just stays thee. I don't see any button to click that is "continue" or anything like that. Is anyone else having that problem?
I think it's just taking a while for you to get to the upload screen. You should probably check if your uploads got sent first. Go to "My Account", then "My Uploads" and see if your uploads are there.
If not, try uploading and just waiting it out. It might be slow depending on your computer hardware or your internet speed.
Also, if you're uploading a video, you might wanna check the length. I remember I had a similar problem, that was caused because the video was too long.
Hi, this post #94987 got a few disapprovals for 'breaking the rules', but I can't find any rules against it. Also, one of the disapprovals mentioned that it's an unedited AI image, which it is not - I edit/fix the eyes, change or enhance the expressions, fix hands, edit the background to add some visual storytelling, do color correction, remove artifacts and add details. I had reached out to a couple admins but nothing has come of it so far. This post has been left unapproved for 12+ days so I'd appreciate it if someone either approved it or deleted it. Thanks
Ok, I got my post to upload but it says some people think it breaks the rules? But I'm not sure what rule it would be breaking? post #95363
emilysafeharbor said:
Ok, I got my post to upload but it says some people think it breaks the rules? But I'm not sure what rule it would be breaking? post #95363
Your uploads are in somewhat of a gray area so the mod team checked the break rules box. The reason being is that your uploads are toeing the line of what the staff would consider Bleached. While yes, they are pro-white in nature. The video content is essentially just AMV esque dancing however. My advice would be to lean more into the HMV aspect or create a better framework for the content'a presentation
OK, sorry but I guess I"m really just not understanding the rules? This was breaking the rules too;
I thought it was very explicitly bleached?
How is this "bad quality"?
reason for deletion of this post?
post #95715
let me know why
Lurgwort said:
reason for deletion of this post?
post #95715let me know why
The art you uploaded comes from the breed of artists that pump out slop geared towards gooners with no taste. I will admit you have a good understanding of skin editing and can easily apply it on other pieces.
emilysafeharbor said:
OK, sorry but I guess I"m really just not understanding the rules? This was breaking the rules too;
I thought it was very explicitly bleached?
1. The caption is difficult to read because it bleeds into the background very easily. Use a stroke or drop shadow effect to ensure your text is readable
2. Per the rules: Dangerous IRL Editing: While editing JAV stars, cosplayers, and other such public figures is fine, editing IRL individuals who are liable to harass the Booru or are not public sexual figures (Examples: Twitter user with active base, your neighbor, OnlyFans nobody, etc.) is not.
White_guy_in_touch said:
How is this "bad quality"?
The post wasn't deleted for bad quality. You'll see that the post was deleted because it sat in queue for 3 days without one of the staff approving it.
Hi, I'd need explanation for these pictures, I really want to contribute to the spread of bleach NSFW but every time I've posted here my uploads were rejected.
post #95897
post #95898
post #95899
MedieteLove said:
Hi, I'd need explanation for these pictures, I really want to contribute to the spread of bleach NSFW but every time I've posted here my uploads were rejected.
post #95897
post #95898
post #95899
In the mega there is a tutorial video. Watch it and pay extra attention to the aspect about warping. Using your last edit as an example, the Breed Right Breed White tattoo is completely unnatural to the curve of her skin.
I thought muscle shotas where ok, I didn't think it was a problem, it came out with reasons of "not bleached" which I do not undertsand and "+ what the fuck?" again I am not sure what that means
When I first uploaded this edit, it was approved, but there was a minor mistake which I fixed, and the version with the mistake was deleted upon request so that I could replace it with the fixed version.
Why was the fixed version rejected when the initial version (with the mistake) was approved?
jojinho said:
When I first uploaded this edit, it was approved, but there was a minor mistake which I fixed, and the version with the mistake was deleted upon request so that I could replace it with the fixed version.
Why was the fixed version rejected when the initial version (with the mistake) was approved?
idk. approved.
TheBlockhead said:
I thought muscle shotas where ok, I didn't think it was a problem, it came out with reasons of "not bleached" which I do not undertsand and "+ what the fuck?" again I am not sure what that means
"not bleached" means it has nothing to do with bleached. it's literally just some random ai art.
even if it was bleached, i'm gonna be honest. i don't think anyone wants to see that shit.
"not bleached" means it has nothing to do with bleached. it's literally just some random ai art.
even if it was bleached, i'm gonna be honest. i don't think anyone wants to see that shit.
ok, wait .
1: "it has nothing to do with bleached" I still do not understand what that means,
2: "it's literally just some random ai art." is that not just ALL AI art? and If I go tot he tag on this site I see jsut random ai art, so what is the deal?
3: "i don't think anyone wants to see that shit." you don't know that
not complaining mind you, I just honestly want to know the exact TOS or rules of the site, so I ether don't do the same mistake or do not step on toes
TheBlockhead said:
ok, wait .
1: "it has nothing to do with bleached" I still do not understand what that means,
2: "it's literally just some random ai art." is that not just ALL AI art? and If I go tot he tag on this site I see jsut random ai art, so what is the deal?
3: "i don't think anyone wants to see that shit." you don't know thatnot complaining mind you, I just honestly want to know the exact TOS or rules of the site, so I ether don't do the same mistake or do not step on toes
"it has nothing to do with bleached" means it doesn't conform to the rules of the site (help%3Arules) and doesn't follow any themes of white-dominance raceplay
also, it breaks these rules:
- no solo unedited pictures (plain pinups)
- no unedited AI art (all the "random" AI art you see has some sort of editing or post-processing)
- low quality art (there are noticeable flaws in the artwork, such as the rings on the jacket being different sizes and his left hand missing a finger)
TheBlockhead said:
ok, wait .
1: "it has nothing to do with bleached" I still do not understand what that means,
2: "it's literally just some random ai art." is that not just ALL AI art? and If I go tot he tag on this site I see jsut random ai art, so what is the deal?
3: "i don't think anyone wants to see that shit." you don't know thatnot complaining mind you, I just honestly want to know the exact TOS or rules of the site, so I ether don't do the same mistake or do not step on toes
Hi Blockhead, let me elaborate a little on what Gorge is trying to explain to you. A disclaimer before I go over everything he has pointed out until you, if you feel like you're not understanding what I'm trying to convey to you, please check the site rules with the link below and get a better understanding of what's bleached and how post approval works:
help%3Arules
-
Now onto the explanation.
Firstly, "Nothing to do with bleached" means that there's nothing within the picture you posted that is related to bleached.
What yousent is an AI picture of a white kid. That isn't bleached. But what could be considered bleached in this site? I'll let the wiki do the job for me here as it has a much more polished and defined version:*A white male having sex with a nonwhite female
*A white male topping a nonwhite male
*Content that puts a white male into a "desirable" status of some sort, which would include femdom content where a nonwhite female takes him by force.
*A character in "theme clothing", which includes queen of hearts chokers, Bleached gymwear, etc.
*All "raceplay" (sexual racism) content that emphasizes the desirability/dominance/etc of white men, or adjacent themes to this. This includes various types of femdom where a nonwhite female tops, white female humiliation by nonwhite females, and other niche themes. If unsure, please ask a moderator.
*Polplay and outfits related to white supremacist / white loving ideals (i.e. national socialism, "Amerikini", etc.)
*Skin edits that turn a nonwhite male into a white male, or a female into a white or nonwhite.
*Edits that place a tattoo onto a girl that fits the Bleached theme or related political themes.
What you posted is an AI image, which doesn't breaks the rules, but what our mod GorgeWBussy was trying to tell you, is that it was 'random' AI art, that lacked elements that relate to the previous points I mentioned. This means, that your image wasn't approved because it lacked these elements. But now according to the rules -
"AI Art: The Booru will not host any art that was created with the use of AI programs. There will be very few, if any, exceptions to this rule." Now, I don't know what could count as an exception because only just today I uploaded a AI picture that contains a skin edit over a male. But likely the response of any admin or mod would be no, unless it meets quality standards and doesn't violates any of the rules of what can't be posted, you likely will be able to. I now invite you to please ask a mod who is familiarized with the rules or admin since I'm able to provide little to none information, I don't have any evidence or information to backup my statement, therefore what I'm saying here can't be taken as true.
So, let's recapitulate. Bleached generally consists of a white male (or futanari in some cases) in sexually dominant positions, or topping another male of any other race. Edits that place a tattoo onto a girl that fits the Bleached theme or related political themes can also be considered bleached. Hopefully this helps you get a better grasp of what bleached is and dispells any doubts you might have had. Again, feel free to check out the rules at the link I provided, and ask any of the active administrators or mods for more information over any doubts you might have.
Updated
GorgeWBussy said:
"not bleached" means it has nothing to do with bleached. it's literally just some random ai art.
even if it was bleached, i'm gonna be honest. i don't think anyone wants to see that shit.
post #95951 you approved this which has literally nothing to do with Bleached in any capacity. Total pedo death, I agree there, but consistency would be nice